![]() ![]() Nothing in the complaint showed control over the seller or ratification.ĭespite this fact, however, the Court still found Matrix was directly liable for the calls–and you don’t see that every day. The Court agrees with Matrix that the complaint lacked vicarious liability allegations. June 26, 2023) the warranty defendant moved to dismiss arguing the complaint failed to allege facts demonstrating either vicarious or directly liability for the calls at issue. And the fact that the warranty company and the seller had the same lawyer had a lot to do with it. An auto warranty company is trapped in a TCPA lawsuit after a court found allegations of direct liability sufficient to find calls made by an apparent seller were actually made by the warranty company itself directly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |